Energy Fuels Completes Drilling Near Grand Canyon

by April 16, 2017
 

GRAND CANYON, AZ — Energy Fuels Inc. recently reported that it has completed drilling of it’s uranium mine shaft at Canyon Mine, which is located just miles from the Grand Canyon. The company is now creating a plan based upon results of the drilling before it can resume construction at the site. They have also temporarily fired most of their workers.

Energy Fuels threatens that uranium ore extraction could begin at Canyon Mine as early as June 2017.

“Energy Fuels is violating Mother Earth, desecrating sacred Red Butte, and now bringing poisonous water laced with uranium out of their mine near the Grand Canyon. It is an outrage to witness careless mine workers spray radioactive pollution over these sacred lands.” stated Klee Benally, a coordinator with Clean Up The Mines and volunteer with Haul No!, “That they are also transporting millions of gallons of this toxic contaminants through Diné Bikeyah (Navajo Nation) without our informed consent, where our communities continue to suffer the effects of the nuclear industry’s deadly legacy, is an outrage. If Canyon Mine is allowed to further desecrate Mother Earth, we face the threat of hundreds of trucks carrying millions of pounds of radioactive ore on our roads and over our waterways. We will not allow that to happen, Haul No!”

Canyon Mine spraying contaminated water – March 12, 2017

On Sunday, March 12, 2017, representatives from Haul No!, Diné No Nukes, Clean Up The Mines, The Golden Rule, Veterans for Peace, Sierra Club, & Center for Biological Diversity, conducted a site visit to monitor Canyon Mine operations. The groups witnessed Energy Fuels workers spraying water more than 40 feet into the air and multiple unmarked water trucks on driving into the site. They also witnessed the water being sprayed into surrounding forest and traditional cultural property.

It was revealed that water that had accumulated at the bottom of the mine shaft. Due to the issue, Energy Fuels began trucking the contaminated water to the White Mesa Mill uranium processing facility near Blanding, Utah and spraying it, into the air and on the adjacent Kaibab National Forest, in an attempt to evaporate it. The Plan of Operations approved by Kaibab National Forest, requires that all excess water be retained in holding ponds and be treated on-site. (Read the press release here)

Several of those monitoring took a banner reading “Don’t Nuke Grand Canyon, Stop Canyon Mine” into the mining area and confronted the workers. Miners stated that “nothing toxic” was coming out of the mine. According to the Arizona Republic, samples taken at the mine’s holding pond tested at 130 parts of dissolved uranium per billion. Environmental Protection Agency regulations state that anything over 30 parts per billion is unsafe to drink.

Although the groups have provided video and photo documentation, the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and Kaibab National Forest Service have denied any violations have occurred.

Communities on the Navajo Nation along the haul route from Canyon Mine to the White Mesa Mill were not formally notified of hazardous materials being transported.

Leona Morgan detecting radiation levels at Canyon Mine

“This is another prime example of environmental racism,... to allow unregulated transport of radioactive liquids in unmarked trucks through communities and without notifying the public or any of the surrounding Indigenous Nations. We have a right to know, at the very least, so proper preparations and emergency response are in place in case of a spill or accident,” said Leona Morgan, who works with Diné No Nukes and is a Haul No! Volunteer.

Havasupai council member Carletta Tilousi previously stated, “The Canyon Mine not only threatens the Havasupai people and land but, potentially all Colorado River users downriver including Las Vegas and Los Angeles. The Havasupai Tribe, guardians of the Grand Canyon, are under attack and request your support and prayers to protect the Grand Canyon from mining for uranium for use in nuclear reactors for the benefit of the US and the profit of the dying nuclear industry.”

Red Butte is a sacred site and designated as a traditional cultural property, Canyon Mine is located within the sacred site’s established boundaries.

Red Butte, sacred Site under attack

The Havasupai Nation & environmental groups have pending lawsuits against the Forest Service and Energy Fuels regarding threats to the sacred site and violations of the NEPA process. A decision is expected any day.

If Energy Fuels is permitted to proceed, up to 25 trucks hauling up to 30 tons of highly radioactive ore per day could be barrelling down small roads and highways through Arizona. The ore would travel through towns such as Valle, Williams, and Flagstaff; through Navajo reservation communities including Cameron, Tuba City, and Kayenta; near the Hopi reservation; and finally arrive at Energy Fuel’s White Mesa Mill only three miles from the Ute Mountain Ute tribal community of White Mesa, Utah.

The Navajo Nation has a law that restricts transport of radioactive materials, including uranium ore, “over, under or across Navajo Indian Country”; however, Navajo does not have jurisdiction over the state roads of the haul route. The Navajo Nation has already been devastated by 523 abandoned uranium mines and 22 wells that have been closed by the EPA due to high levels of radioactive pollution

On March 25, at the Navajo Nation’s Western Agency Council meeting, Cameron Chapter President Milton Tso successfully sponsored a resolution which requested eighteen Navajo Nation Chapters to ban the proposed transport of uranium ore, contaminated water, and any other material from Canyon Mine.

Sarana Riggs, a Haul No! volunteer, presented at the meeting. “The chapter house was so packed that people had to wait outside or stand wherever they could find a spot.” said Riggs, “All these people from the Western agency were there to hear many community concerns including information regarding Canyon Mine. Most of those in attendance were not aware of the transport route or mining of ore and addressed their own concerns of past uranium mines which continue to haunt their families on the Navajo Reservation. After the vote and meeting, many individuals were asking us to help host public education meetings for their own communities.”

“I am concerned why our elected leaders are not more involved in educating the communities, are they waiting for another disaster before we address this issue? We’re going to do our best to educate and stop the transport of ore and ultimately shut down Canyon Mine! We have faced too much heartbreak from łeetsó (uranium) and we have to leave this monster in the ground!” stated Riggs.

This article was originally published at Haul No!
 
  • Georges Radjou
    April 18, 2017 at 4:31 pm

    ON THE VERY SHORT TERM WHAT IS IMPORTANT FOR BUSINESS IS GROWTH AND FUELLING CITY DEVELOPEMENT AND ENERGY CONSUMPTIONS AND SATISFYING NEEDS. ON THE LONG RUN WE WILL BE PRESUMABLY ALL DEAD. BEST OPTION IS TOO LOOK AT THE MIDDLE RANGE (IN BETWEEN SHORT TERMIST AND LONG TERMIST EXPECTATIONS). IT IS THE REASON WHY RENEWABLE ENERGIES (WIND, SUN, SEA, THERMAL...ENERGIES ARE ALTERNATIVE TO CLASSIC ENERGY (OIL, COAL...)
    1- My commentary:
    1.1. I think, if I look that the business and human right guiding principles, in principle people should be consulted prior to the construction. However, there is a 2nd principle acting, which is an incentive to use nuclear materials.
    Nuclear is sustainable energy:
    1.2. Nuclear energy is not emitting fossil fuels (CO2) in such a way, modern states consider it as a safe alternative to oil consumption (and the fossil fuel energies).
    Issues: nuclear wastes long life:
    1.3. If the risk of nuclear waste is not entirely controlled. It is an even higher risk than CO2 emission -I assumed- CO2 in the atmosphere can last 1 or 2 centuries, while the nuclear wastes can stay for ever (and nuclear energy can be a potential risks for future generations -and as we have learned from Fukushima disaster, the risk to present generation cannot be discarded, particularly, when the distance range of nuclear plant is closed to cities or densely populated areas. The nuclear extraction needs to be safe and controlled (bearing in mind another principle, which is risk "0" does not exist.
    1.4. Conclusion:
    1.4.1. In all case, looking at all aspect of the Business and human rights, communities need to be consulted prior to take action to make land excavation or mineral extractions and governments should protect communities, and business respect communities.
    1.4.2. They are alternatives to nuclear energy of the past, with renewable energies (sun, geothermal, wind, tidal...) to fuel cities. Presumably this can lead in redesigning cities in a sustainable ways, particularly being more innovative with the transport systems, the housing that need to be isolated, also saving more on classic energy, and changing the components and elements of architectures. For example, making lighter components.
    1.4.3. Also, recycling more than using new mineral from the lands and business excavations

    UN Guiding Principles
    2- Here are some keynotes about what the 2- UN guiding principles say through the working groups: - Promotion and protection of all human rights: political, economical, civil, cultural, development https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/G11/144/71/PDF/G1114471.pdf?OpenElement HCR/17/14 request working group to - promote Business and HR principle, (protect, respect, remedy framework) A- STATE BUSINESS NEXUS Respect of all HR in a state territory in all their supply chain stages → state law enforcement of BH → state law should not constrain but enable business respect for HR → provide effective guidance on how to promote BHR →encourage and when appropriate request how they address the communication of BHR impacts → States should take steps against human rights abuses → State should exercise adequate oversight to meet their international obligations → states should promote BHR in the commercial transaction B- SUPPORTING BUSINESS RESCPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN CONFLICT AFFECTED AREAS States should ensure that businesses are not involved in the abuses → being proactive in order to identify, mitigate BHR → support businesses to address heightened risks of abuses (particularly gender based and sexual violence) → states should not give supports to businesses involved in high risk abuses → ensuring that policies, regulations, measures are effective in addressing these abuses → states should maintain policy spaces to held the bHR principles (investment treaties ;..) Guiding principles- http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf C) ENSURING POLICY COHERENCE States should ensure that all levels of the national institutions and public services are aware of these BHR risk (and providing them with the relevant information and supports States as members of multilateral institutions, should : → ensure that their is not restriction of their abilities (states…) toward the BHR → encourage, protect against (including uses of technical assistance → use the GP as pillar to promote shared understanding (cooperation….) ...Read more about the concept of Business and Human rights

    Reply

Leave a Response