Wade Davis on Cultural Diversity

Wade Davis on Cultural Diversity

Support our journalism. Become a Patron!
John Ahni Schertow
December 8, 2007
 

In a passionate defense of real multiculturalism delivered back in 2003, National Geographic Explorer-in-Residence Wade Davis used his wealth of his experiences living and working with Indigenous People around the world to build a powerful argument in favor of cultural diversity:

The world in which we live in does not exist in some absolute sense but is just one model of reality, the consequence of one particular set of adapted choices that our lineage made albeit successfully many generations ago. And of course we all share the same adaptive imperative, we are all born, we all bring our children to world, we go through initiation rights, we have to deal with inexplicable separation of death so it shouldn’t surprise us that we all sing, we all dance, we all have art. But what is interesting is the unique cadence of the song, the rhythm of the dance in every culture.

He also introduced the idea of an ethnosphere to the audience:

Together the myriad cultures of the world make up a web of spiritual life and culture life that envelops the planet and that is as important to the well being of the planet as indeed is the biological web of life that you know as the biosphere. And you may think of this cultural web of live as being an ethnosphere. You may define the ethnosphere as being the sum total of all thoughts and dreams, myths, ideas and inspirations, intuitions brought into being by the human imagination since the dawn of consciousness

And presents an alarming picture of its “erosion”:

Just as the biosphere is being severely eroded, so too is the ethnosphere and if anything at a far greater rate: No biologist would dare suggest 50 percent of all species or more of them are on the brink of extinction, because it’s simply not true. And that, the most apocalyptic scenario in the realm of biological diversity scarcely approaches what we know to be the most optimistic scenario in the realm of cultural diversity and the great indicator of that is language loss.

Blaming not change or technology for the damage to its integrity, but power, he cautions that the model civil society has grown to accept is not sufficient. That 300 years from now it will be remembered as the era “we stood by, and either actively endorsed or passively accepted the massive destruction of both biological and cultural diversity on the planet.”

It is humbling to remember that our species is perhaps being around 600,000 years. The Neolithic revolution which gave us agriculture, at which time we succumbed to the cult of the seed, the poetry of the shaman was displaced by the prose of the priesthood, we created hierarchy, specialization, surplus, is only 10,000 years ago. The modern industrial world as we know is barely 300 years old. Now that shallow history doesn’t suggest [to] me we have all the answers for all the challenges that will confront us in the ensuing millennia.

The fact is, that very history threatens to drown us all because nothing of substance has been learned from the past. Sure some advances has been made, but at the same time there is an endless stream of consequences to those advancements that relegates diversity and the very life we all depend on, especially those who’ve retained their connection to their own culture.

We're fighting for our lives

Indigenous Peoples are putting their bodies on the line and it's our responsibility to make sure you know why. That takes time, expertise and resources - and we're up against a constant tide of misinformation and distorted coverage. By supporting IC you're empowering the kind of journalism we need, at the moment we need it most.

independent uncompromising indigenous
Except where otherwise noted, articles on this website are licensed under a Creative Commons License
IC is a publication of the Center for World Indigenous Studies (cwis.org), a 501C(3) based in the United States