The Kadar – removed but not effected

The Kadar – removed but not effected

Support our journalism. Become a Patron!
September 27, 2007

The Kadar, a people living in the Southern of region of India, found out a month ago that the government of Kerala has decided to go ahead with a controversial dam that will force the removal of Two Kadar communities–permanently disjointing them from their cultural life.

The dam, which has been found to be ecologically unsound and anti-development, will also destroy the habitat of numerous endangered species and substantially reduce the water flow of the Chalakkudy river, which tens of thousands of families depend on.

The government seems comfortable ignoring the latter issues, but they claim one of the conditions for the dam’s approval is the Kadar must not be effected. This is quite literally impossible, since one of the communities lives within 400 meters of the proposed dam site.

The government also (rather oddly considering the claim) put together a package for whom we must now call the to-be-removed-but-not-effected Kadar families: one acre of land and a house, “in addition to common facilities for schooling, public health and play ground.” There is no question that the Kadar will be effected.

Well, local resistance is starting to build. Unfortunately, there’s no information available right now; hover there is mention of 33 different organizations recently uniting to oppose the dam. That’s a good start if I ever heard one.

I will keep an eye out for more information.

From Peaceful Societies – On Saturday August 25th, the Kerala Minister for Electricity and SC/ST, Mr. A.K. Balan, held a news conference to announce that construction would begin soon on the Athirappilly dam on the Chalakkudy River, despite the protests. The project has also been approved by the national government, he indicated.

The minister acknowledged the issues that had been raised, but he argued for the government perspective. The project would maintain at least some water flow over two waterfalls in the river downstream, below the dam. Out of the 163 megawatt potential of the dam, three megawatts would be devoted to maintaining a small, natural flow. The two waterfalls evidently receive some 600,000 domestic and foreign visitors per year.

He also acknowledged the concerns of the Kadar people—that they might have to be moved out of their village and could lose their traditional way of life. He said, in the words of a news report, that the “project will not affect any tribal family.” He added “one of the conditions … was that the project should not in any case hinder the life of tribal settlements in the area.”

Mr. Balan added, however, that the government had proposed a package for Kadar families “that might be affected by the project,” which would include a new house on an acre of land per family, plus a common area for a public health facility and a school. In other words, the government is really not going to destroy the village, but if they do, they will provide housing for the affected Kadars.

As minister not only of electricity but also of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, the official may have his own feelings for the welfare of the Kadar. He announced that the proposed reservoir will have facilities for speed boating, trekking, bush walking, and other activities that should attract more tourists to the state on the southeast coast of India. The povernment thus intends to provide jobs for the people affected by the development.

Despite the government’s assurances, opposition to the project appears to be growing, according to a news report on September 14. The Chalakkudy River Protection Forum continues to protest, but the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MOEF), a national government agency, is firmly supporting the dam construction. Both the ruling leftist party in power in Kerala, the Left Democratic Front, and the opposition United Democratic Front, led by the Congress party, support it.

Opponents point out that the project will destroy very sensitive riverine forest lands, disrupt corridor links between important natural areas, and possibly harm a number of animals such as tigers, elephants, leopards, hornbills, liontailed macaques, and Nilgiri languors. The environmental impact assessment, commissioned by the electricity ministry, appears to the environmental community to have been a hurried job. They claim it was an inadequate study that missed many major issues, such as the potential submergence of hundreds of rare plants. The environmental assessors visited in the wrong season for observing the huge numbers of birds that nest in the affected forest.


We're fighting for our lives

Indigenous Peoples are putting their bodies on the line and it's our responsibility to make sure you know why. That takes time, expertise and resources - and we're up against a constant tide of misinformation and distorted coverage. By supporting IC you're empowering the kind of journalism we need, at the moment we need it most.

independent uncompromising indigenous
Except where otherwise noted, articles on this website are licensed under a Creative Commons License