Six Years After the ‘Aymarazo’ Protests in Peru
water Story 433

Six Years After the ‘Aymarazo’ Protests in Peru

Criminal Charges Pending Against 18 Community Leaders and A Billion-Dollar Court Case at ICSID
Photo: YouTube
Support our journalism. Become a Patron!
Avatar
June 27, 2017
 

It’s been six years since the socio-environmental conflict known as the ‘Aymarazo’ in Peru, a mobilization that happened in the province of Puno in 2011, against the mining project ‘Santa Ana’, owned by the Canadian company Bear Creek Mining Corporation.

The project proposed is an open-cast mine near the border with Bolivia, which had planned to extract more that 63 million ounces of silver over a period of 11 years, beginning in 2012. The local population rejected the project because of the potential exploitation and contamination of water sources in the area, including the important Desaguadero River and Lake Titicaca, which Peru and Bolivia share.

As a consequence of the suspending of the project, 18 community leaders are facing criminal charges. They are accused of the alleged crimes of obstruction of public services, disturbing the peace, and aggravated extortion. Among them is Francisca Sarmiento, the only woman leader who is being charged. The public prosecutor is asking for the accused to face 18-28 years of prison and pay over 2 million dollars in compensation. The trial is now in its final stages.

Meanwhile, Bear Creek has sued the Peruvian state at the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes – ICSID – at the World Bank (the case was filed in August of 2014). Under the Free Trade Agreement between Canada and Peru, the corporation seeks a compensation of 1.2 billion dollars for not allowing the Santa Ana silver mine to proceed. Despite this, the corporation is still present in the region, pushing forward with other projects, like the Corani Mining project, also located in the province of Puno.

This is the reality communities that oppose mining in Peru face – they are criminalized and stigmatized for rejecting mining projects, and in this case, for being Indigenous Peoples. The aggressive pro-mining policies that reign in the country have caused many socio-environmental conflicts in indigenous territories, land dispossession, displacement of communities and the violation of human and collective rights. These policies are pushed by transnational corporations like Bear Creek, which benefit from the extraction of natural resources and the violations of the rights of local communities, communities who are fighting to defend their territories.

This is a co-production between The Democracy Center (Leny Olivera Rojas, Sian Cowman, and Aldo Orellana López) and the organization Human Rights and Environment – Puno (DHUMA). DHUMA is part of the organization National Coordination for Human Rights and the Muqui Network in Peru.

bookmarks Follow IC on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter

This article was originally published by Real World Radio. It has been re-published at IC under a Creative Commons License.

We're fighting for our lives

Indigenous Peoples are putting their bodies on the line and it's our responsibility to make sure you know why. That takes time, expertise and resources - and we're up against a constant tide of misinformation and distorted coverage. By supporting IC you're empowering the kind of journalism we need, at the moment we need it most.

independent uncompromising indigenous
Except where otherwise noted, articles on this website are licensed under a Creative Commons License
IC is a publication of the Center for World Indigenous Studies (cwis.org), a 501C(3) based in the United States