All Victims of Neoliberal Policy

All Victims of Neoliberal Policy

Support our journalism. Become a Patron!
John Ahni Schertow
August 15, 2007
 

Last month, thousands of People from four continents, representing 140 organisations from 56 different countries gathered together for the Via Campesina Gathering—an event that’s held every four years “to discuss and plan work and strategies according to the most important aspects of country life (goods, sovereignty, food, agricultural reform, sustainable commerce, biodiversity, human rights, emigrants and rural workers).” This year’s gathering was in Zapatista territory.

From Narco News – In a world of such rich culture, so many languages, so many ecosystems, so many skin colours, campesinos of the globalised world are caught in the same mechanism that impedes the survival of the oldest human activity: agriculture. Ten years of neoliberal policies taking land as commodity and millions of dollars driving practices that leave the land without life and campesinos without land. While implementing industrial and capitalist development policies the bad governments have generated series of grave problems for the campesinos of the world. “The burden falls on the poor,” said the Thai representative. She pointed out that “governments only serve the rich. They make laws that are selective and that depend on whether one is rich or poor, or from the mafia governing the country… They have approved laws to take our natural resources from us. Politicians are businessmen in disguise, using development to their benefit.” Soraia Soriano, representative from Movimiento Sin Tierra (MST), expressed the same complaint: “The Brazilian countryside has become a field of soya, sugar cane and eucalyptus. Agro business and the government gain because they export everything.” She criticised harshly the Bush-Lula alliance to control the global production of bio-combustibles, like ethanol. “Governments administer land and other natural resources in a western way,” the Thai representative deplored.

The governments of the five countries represented at the table confiscate the lands of the campesinos to give to big transnational corporations who in turn exploit resources by imposing monocultures with transgenetic seeds while using chemical fertilisers. Also, as a result of the many free trade agreements with the despicable game of import and export, local market prices have fallen. Under the pretext of modernising the countryside, governments offer credit that ends in debt for campesinos in such a way that they are forced to leave their land and move to the big cities or to “first world” countries.

The crisis in the countryside in India is at such a point that since 1992 150,000 desperate campesinos have committed suicide. In order to create “special economic zones,” 140,000 Indian families lost their land and 80,000 rural workers lost their jobs. Reviving an 1894 law (from English colonialism) the state of India already bought and gave 120,000 hectares to private enterprises. A little while ago they announced the second phase in which they will take another area just as large. According to Yudhvir Singhe of the Bhartiya Kissan Campesina Union (BKU) of India national coordination, the government is deceptive, promising sources of work and a better future in these “special economic zones.” Her opinion was that “the only economic security is a piece of land,” despite only having a quarter of a hectare per family on average.

They suffer the same problems in the so-called “first world” countries. Calisa of Canada’s National Campesino Union condemned the fact that since the 1960s campesinos – who represent only 2 per cent of the Canadian population – have already lost half their farms. She said that it is very difficult to start a farm since none of the younger generation could pay the loans off.

With the introduction of the corporations’ monocultures, respect for Mother Earth is also lost; the thousand-year-old agricultural know-how along with human and cultural relations. “Milk producers can’t drink their own milk, it is full of anti-biotics and never sees daylight… Vegetables grow in land dead from so many chemical products,” said Emmanuel of Quebec’s Countryfolk Union (Canada). The indigenous Pagaqueyor campesino delegate of Northern Thailand contrasted the situation, praising traditional agriculture: “Traditional agriculture of ploughing and rotation respects nature. It lets the land rest to recover the minerals in the ground. We keep forest reserves where we collect medicinal plants… that’s why we demand the right to use and administer our own forest resources… because we, the indigenous, know what’s best for us. Living with the forest is our way of life.” He blamed public schools (in the past, education was in the hands of Buddhist monks) of depreciating the value of the traditional practice of ploughing as “graze-slash-burn.” He is also of the opinion that the schools worked in a way of indirect dispossession: “School programs are a false help for indigenous people… we have lost our history, our traditions, our agricultural methods… They have weakened our affiliation between the indigenous and the diversity of food.”

Before the dramatic situation in the countryside we need to unify, as Emmanuel said, so that “agriculture returns to it’s first vocation of feeding people in a healthy way.” Or in the words of Calissa: “We have to recover the agro culture, the culture of campesinos, because the territory and culture of the people is worth more than money and power.”

Ready for the Final Victory

United we stand, goes the refrain. Yudhvir Singh gave some examples of how the massive campesino movement in India – using Gandhi’s disobedience principal as a main weapon – couldn’t be ignored by the government. And so he told of 71,000 campesinos in his organisation who were arrested during of the WTO that took place in 2002 in Doha (Qatar). Wanting to free them, the prisoners said they wouldn’t go unless the police went to work on their farm plots. Of course the police didn’t agree. “Then,” he continued, “we refused to leave the prison and we managed to occupy the entire police space. We had to bring food for 71,000 prisoners and then pay for the return to our farms.” Thanks to the daily struggles in their vast country they managed to get two autonomous indigenous states.

In Brazil the MST with 2 million members managed to recover land (the size of Italy) for 350 families. “But,” said Soraia Soriano, “after that, we realised it wasn’t enough and we have to organise other aspects of campesino life, such as production, school, goods and health.” That’s why, in 2003, a national school was inaugurated where they teach the true history and national social struggles including other countries. They also organise cultural projects to preserve cultural heritage. In the field of health, they prepare medicine from medicinal plants. Lastly, they started art cooperatives and give special attention to the active incorporation of women in their organisation.

Campesino organisations seek all alliances with other sectors of society in order to have more weight. That’s why, they unite themselves in their struggles with “citizens concerned about the quality of food” (Emmanuel, Canada), traditional fishermen and slum dwellers (Thailand), friendly lawyers (Brazil). And then they unite internationally in Via Campesina to promote equality in economic relations, the exchange rate of goods, social justice, preservation and conquest of natural resources in a globalised and neoliberal world.

In this context, various Via Campesina delegates thanked the Zapatistas for the invitation to the Encuentro and said they had learned much from the Zapatista struggle. Yudhvir Singh told of feeling a “great connection” with the Zapatista people. “I return to my country with a lot of knowledge to share with my organisation which we will use.” Sorai Soriano indicated that “the Zapatistas have been a strength for us. They face a thousand challenges. They are a constant example that different ways of life are possible… we are very similar, we have the same enemy and more or less the same ideas. We have many friends throughout the world… That’s our strength.”

Despite the similarities and having the same enemy, the big difference between the organisations of Via Campesina and the Zapatista organisations resides in relations with government. Although they all call themselves autonomous and independent from political parties, the Zapatistas are the only ones building a total autonomy in all aspects – organisation, health, education, sustainable business, etc. They are the only ones completely denouncing dialogue with the government for their demands. They are the only ones to realise these demands themselves, with no help from the treacherous government. On the other hand, the member organisations of Via Campesina seek to pressure their governments. Similarly, the Union of Canada Countrymen seeks to achieve legal recognition to have the power to influence food policies. In the same way, the Thai organisation tries to demand justice with “bare feet and empty hands.” Soriano said in respect: “We want the government to take responsibility by giving us homes, roads, drinking water, electricity, etc., because it has a lot of resources. It must attend to our necessities.” But at the same time he recognised that it’s not always the case and one is obligated to organise oneself.

Be that as it may, the Encuentro between the Zapatistas and the People of the World showed today once again that capitalist forces aren’t everywhere and that resistance and heroic protest against neoliberalism and for humanity is expanding daily across the whole of planet Earth.

Originally published in Spanish August 2
Translation by Deano
Read the Full Article

We're fighting for our lives

Indigenous Peoples are putting their bodies on the line and it's our responsibility to make sure you know why. That takes time, expertise and resources - and we're up against a constant tide of misinformation and distorted coverage. By supporting IC you're empowering the kind of journalism we need, at the moment we need it most.

independent uncompromising indigenous
Except where otherwise noted, articles on this website are licensed under a Creative Commons License
IC is a publication of the Center for World Indigenous Studies (cwis.org), a 501C(3) based in the United States