Alaska Tribes Call for Solidarity to Stop World’s Largest Gold Mine
Bristol Bay in focus ⬿

Alaska Tribes Call for Solidarity to Stop World’s Largest Gold Mine

Final public comment period for the Pebble Mine permit ends on July 1st, 2019
First Chief of the Curyung Tribal Council, Tom Tilden, Photo credit: Giovanna Marcantonio
Support our journalism. Become a Patron!
Avatar
June 26, 2019
 

Trump Administration officials have fast-tracked permits for the largest open-pit mine in North America. The proposed Pebble Mine had previously seemed paralyzed, after more than a decade of relentless opposition by Alaska Native elders and youth. Now, plans for the mine are being rushed forward. The final public comment period for the proposed U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) permit ends on Monday July 1st, 2019.

Under the Obama administration, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wrote that the Pebble Mine would result in a “complete loss of fish habitat” (PDF) in a proposed determination to block the project. The mine is planned to excavate ore amid the headwaters of the streams that spawn the world’s biggest sockeye salmon populations, in Alaska’s Bristol Bay region. This single mine is slated to disfigure an area larger than Manhattan.

Over thirty Alaskan Native village communities, living off of the road system, rely on the wild salmon threatened by the mine; on average they depend on subsistence for more than 50% of their food supply. Between 60 and 80 percent of residents’ subsistence diets and over 75% of local jobs in the hub community of Dillingham rely on local salmon.

“Taking our salmon away would be like what happened to the ‘lower 48 Indians’ when they took the buffalo away. They just couldn’t survive without that buffalo. We can’t survive without our fish here. We are the highest consumers of fish per capita in the United States.” First Chief of the Curyung Tribal Council, Tom Tilden

First Chief of the Curyung Tribal Council, Tom Tilden. Photo credit: Giovanna Marcantonio

On June 19, 2019. Verner Wilson III, a member of the Curyung Tribe who now works for Friends of the Earth, was in Washington D.C. lobbying members of the U.S. house of representatives to to support amendment 90 to the omnibus spending package H.R. 2740 offered by Congressperson Jared Huffman (D. CA).

If signed into law, that amendment would block the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers from using any of its 2020 budget to continue the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Pebble Mine. Huffman worked for the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental law firm spearheading opposition to the proposed Pebble Mine, before running for office.

The amendment was approved by 233 to 201. The house then passed the bill with amendment 90 attached, though the senate is advancing its own version of the spending bill without the amendment.

“The entire US House of Representatives has spoken on Pebble Mine for the first time ever and the people of Bristol Bay and Alaska prevailed in a showing of support for our fisheries, wildlife and culture,” Wilson said. “We have an uphill battle in the Senate but we’ve all got to keep trying until our national treasure Bristol Bay is protected!”

The proposed Pebble Mine was designed around excavating an open pit two miles long and three miles wide, and at least a quarter of a mile deep. It would endanger an average of 37.5 million sockeye salmon returning annually. The threatened salmon provide over 14,000 jobs in commercial fishing, which generate about $480 million annually, according to the EPA’s 2014 Bristol Bay Watershed Assessment.

The Pebble Partnership’s current permit application proposes a 20-year mine plan that is significantly smaller than the plans they initially discussed. A financial feasibility study (PDF) by a career Rio Tinto permitting expert, commissioned by the Natural Resources Defense Council, argues that this plan is not profitable, given the associated infrastructure costs.

The Pebble Partnership has not published a financial feasibility study of the mine plan that they have taken into permitting, despite repeated calls to do so. Typically such a plan is required as part of the permitting process.

The Pebble Partnership CEO Tom Collier said during an April, 2019, breakfast for the proposed Mines’ supporters in Anchorage, AK ”We don’t have a secret plan. We don’t have any specific plan to come back and expand this mine site. Now, I’d be the first to admit, that this only takes ten percent of the known deposit out of the ground, what we’re taking into permitting. Somebody is likely to come along at some point in the future and want to expand this mine site.”

In a secretly recorded video, former Pebble Partnership CEO John Shively was captured speaking to the Northwest Fisheries Association in 2013 and saying, “we didn’t want to permit the whole mine because we didn’t think that that was responsible. We wanted to mine the first 20 years and then come back in and look at another phase.”

Permitting only the first phase of a planned development is called “segmenting.” It is illegal under U.S. federal law, according to a 1985 ruling in the 9th circuit.

Taken in the context of Collier’s recent statements, Shively’s statement calls into question whether the Pebble Partnership’s permitting applications and Tom Collier’s statements are sincere.

Wild salmon prepared to be put in the smoke house by Yup’ik Elder Bobby Andrew (1943-2015). Photo credit: Giovanna Marcantonio

Tilden and other members of tribal traditional councils and allies spoke out at annual shareholder meetings, pressuring a succession of four major mining companies to pull out of the proposed Pebble Mine: Mitsubishi in 2011, Anglo American in 2013, Rio Tinto in 2014, and First Quantum Minerals, as well as BlackRock, the world’s largest investment firm, in 2018.

In spite of these setbacks, the Pebble Partnership continues to seek permits and investors to excavate what it claims are five hundred billion dollars worth of gold, copper and other minerals. According to SEC filings, the company has offered a bonus of between $7.5 million and $12.5 million to its CEO, veteran D.C. lobbyist Tom Collier, should the mine get permitted.

bookmarks The film We Can’t Eat Gold, which focuses on the struggle against the mine, has been updated and re-released to cover the Trump Administration’s recent dash to permit the proposed Pebble Mine. You can watch it for free below. (Disclosure: contributing author Josh Tucker directed this film.)

Trump team bows to lobbyists, ignores scientists and Alaska Natives

President Trump’s first EPA Administrator, Scott Pruitt, met with Collier and others during his first days in office. Since then, the permit applications for the proposed mine have been rocketing through USACE channels at a record pace.

The permitting process for Alaska’s Donlin Mine took six years, and Arizona’s Rosemont mine took nine years. USACE is on track to complete their permitting process for the much larger proposed Pebble Mine in just two years.

Pruitt wrote a memo (PDF) to EPA staff ordering draft regulatory changes to be submitted to the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which would retroactively strip the EPA of the authority under which it issued the proposed determination to preemptively block the proposed Pebble Mine in 2014.

Current EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler has recused himself from decisions regarding the proposed Pebble Mine, since his former law firm, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, worked for the Pebble Partnership including arranging meetings between Pruitt and Collier.

‘Rushed’ Army Corps process denounced by Alaska Natives

The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), is a key permitting and political vehicle for starting construction on Pebble Mine. Many Alaska Natives and their allies who are opposing the proposed Pebble Mine raise critical objections to the DEIS, which is the subject of the current and final USACE public comment period.

Bobby Andrew

Bobby Andrew (1943-2015) was a Yup’ik Elder who worked internationally for over a decade to protect his home from the proposed Pebble Mine. Photo credit: Giovanna Marcantonio

United Tribes of Bristol Bay, an organization representing fifteen tribal governments and over half of the region’s population, issued a statement quoting Alaska Native activist, Alannah Hurley:

“The Army Corps’ review ignores the very real concerns about the changes and devastation Pebble would bring to our region, and is clearly the result of a rushed process that has ignored local voices and ignores the existing science in the Bristol Bay Watershed Assessment that shows how devastating this project would be in Bristol Bay.” Alaska Native activist Alannah Hurley

The DEIS estimates that Pebble Mine would generate an average of 6.8 billion gallons per year of wastewater during operations and 11.8 billion gallons per year during phase one of closure.

The wastewater would be heavily contaminated with toxic sludge, including heavy metal compounds left over from mineral extraction. Importantly, this hazardous wastewater would cripple salmon’s abilities to find their way to spawning beds to be able to reproduce.

“The Army Corps of Engineers should be asking the Pebble Partnership tough questions, and holding the public review process to the standard required by law for the benefit of all Americans.” said Norm Van Vactor, Bristol Bay Economic Development Corporation President and CEO.

“Instead they have chosen to simply fast track the Pebble project and cut corners on the process. They have failed to require the company to submit a typically standard economic feasibility study. They have failed to require the company to submit a plan for environmental cleanup in the event of a failure that jeopardizes our region’s fish and jobs. They have failed to even ask Pebble to present a plan for the worst-case scenario where a tailings dam fails and exposes the waters of our region to toxic mine waste. These kinds of answers needed to make an informed decision when it comes to Pebble mine and our future,” said Van Vactor.

Tailings dam superstructure courts disaster

Over 50 mine tailings pond dams have failed worldwide between 2009 and 2019.

Despite clear evidence that tailings ponds often fail, the DEIS does not bother to evaluate the risk of this kind of dam failure.

The DEIS only contemplates a 20-year time frame overall, which neatly avoids any acknowledgement of permanent risks that Pebble Mine would leave in the Alaskan landscape. The vast expenses involved in stabilizing massive amounts of liquid toxic wastewater for countless decades look much cheaper when merely two decades are accounted for.

Beyond this 20-year range, the tailings pond dam would be required to contain toxic tailings in perpetuity and would have a 1 in 5 five chance of failing within one hundred years.

Pebble goo

Officials continue to assess the destruction and ongoing environmental harm caused by the Fundão dam’s failure. Photo by Romerito Pontes from São Carlos.

Additionally, the Pebble Mine would require water treatment on a scale never before achieved (PDF) by any hard rock mine.

A dam seven times taller than the Washington Monument could be required to contain the tailings pond. Consulting firm Knight Piésold designed the Mount Polley Mine tailings pond dam that failed in 2014, leading to what was called Canada’s worst mining disaster.

mount polley

Mount Polley mine dam failure (CC license)

The Pebble Limited Partnership has proposed to the Army Corps of Engineers that Knight Piésold will design the tailings pond dam for the proposed Pebble Mine.

Making matters even more hazardous, some geologists say a fault line may run through or within 5 miles of the proposed mine site. Any fault line would increase the risk of the proposed tailings pond dam breaking open and spilling toxic materials into the headwaters of the Bristol Bay watershed. Some geologists believe the deposit the mine would aim to extract was likely created through geological effects of the fault itself. Mine proponents claim that the fault runs 18 miles away from the proposed mine site.

Geophysical locations of Lake Clark fault. Initial mapping of the Lake Clark fault estimates the fault to be within 10 miles. Aeromagnetic methods shows the fault a few miles to the north of the mine. In either case the the fault is likely closer than 18 miles, the distance PLP assumes in its hazard calculations. (Solid line is actual mapping of the fault, dashed line is extrapolation of mapping.) Brentwood “Hig” Higman Ph.D. generated this figure and grants permission for republication. It contains peer reviewed data published here.

“If the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the state of Alaska let Pebble get away with their current incomplete studies, their dams might be designed to fail in future earthquakes,” wrote Alaskan geologist Brentwood “Hig” Higman Ph.D, while gathering data on the history of earthquakes near the proposed mine site.

The DEIS does not address the fault line at all, though 4.6 to 5.7 magnitude earthquakes have occurred there and Higman wrote that a magnitude 7 or greater earthquake could occur there.

A previously unknown fault line triggered a massive 7.0 magnitude earthquake in Anchorage, AK, just 200 miles from the proposed mine site on November 30, 2018.

New Alaska governor trades favors with miners

Permits from the State of Alaska would also be required for the Pebble Mine. In November 2018, Mike Dunleavy (R) was elected Alaska’s governor. All three of his daughters work at Alaska’s Red Dog Mine. In his first public appearance after taking office, Dunleavy spoke at a mining conference. He praised former Pebble Partnership CEO, John Shively.

Dunleavy has appointed Jason Brune, a former official of one of the mining companies that initially backed the proposed Pebble Mine, Anglo-American, to head the Alaska Department of Environmental Conversation. The agency is responsible for issuing dozens of state permits for the proposed mine.

Brune joked in a tweet last year that Christmas had come early when the proposed Pebble Mine entered the USACE permitting process, according to the Alaska Public Radio Network.

In the same election, an Alaska ballot initiative that would have required further permitting for the proposed mine was defeated after the backers were outspent 14 to one with support from the Pebble Partnership. Tom Collier, John Shively and a number of other current and former Pebble Partnership employees also donated to Dunleavy’s campaign.

At the beginning of March, Pebble Partnership CEO Tom Collier said “no one gives a rat’s ass about what happens in Alaska,” according to McClatchy.

“Our coalition has called on international organizations to take action on the last great wild salmon fishery left on the planet,” Wilson said, describing the Save Bristol Bay coalition’s ongoing work to reach potential allies.

A family practicing subsistence set net fishing near Dillingham, Alaska. Photo credit: Giovanna Marcantonio

While gutting salmon at a Curyung Tribal Fish camp, then 14-year-old activist Heidi Kritz said,

“I remember when I was a little girl (and) I first started cutting fish. I learned how to split my first fish. Everyone was so excited down (on) the beach, and my grandparents. There was two boat loads of fish and everyone was just having a good time. That’s what brings our family together, that’s what brings everyone together – the fish. If there was no fish, I think our culture would just completely die. It’s not just us who eats the fish, it’s the animals and the land uses it too.” – Heidi Kritz

Youth cutting salmon at the Curyung Tribal Culture Camp

Youth cutting salmon at the Curyung Tribal Culture Camp in Dillingham, Alaska. Photo credit: Giovanna Marcantonio

The Army Corps of Engineers is taking comments via their website. The current deadline is Monday July 1st, 2019. Updates about We Cant Eat Gold are available via the film’s Facebook page.

This article contains material from an article by Josh Tucker for Unicorn Riot. Special thanks to Unicorn Riot for permission to re-publish the material.

bookmarks Follow IC on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter

We're fighting for our lives

Indigenous Peoples are putting their bodies on the line and it's our responsibility to make sure you know why. That takes time, expertise and resources - and we're up against a constant tide of misinformation and distorted coverage. By supporting IC you're empowering the kind of journalism we need, at the moment we need it most.

independent uncompromising indigenous
Except where otherwise noted, articles on this website are licensed under a Creative Commons License
IC is a publication of the Center for World Indigenous Studies (cwis.org), a 501C(3) based in the United States