Mexico: The Lacandona Rainforest is being cleared of its People

Posted by Ahni on March 12, 2010 at 12:30pm 6 comments 645 views

The Mexican government is moving ahead with an ambitious new plan to surround the Lacandona Forest in Chiapas, Mexico, with oil palm plantations; while disguising the forest around the plantations with various eco-tourism sites.

In preparing for the two-faced project, the government---still in line with the old ambitious plan---and with the help of various corporations, is clearing the Rainforest of its Indigenous People.

The most recent evictions took place on Jan. 21 and 22 at the indigenous Tselales settlements of Laguna El Suspiro and Laguna San Pedro---"the last one a base community of the Zapatista rebel movement," explains the WW4Report.

The Zapatista have since come forward to denounce the evictions, stating:

"The bad federal government, the PRD state government of Juan Sabines Guerrero and the municipal president of Ocosingo, Carlos Leon Solorsano Arcia, have carried out a military operation, including federal police accompanied by bad government officials of the Attorney General for Environmental Protection (PROFEPA). During the operation, four helicopters hovered over the community Laguna San Pedro, to scare the population."

"Participating in this operation were police agents, the Mexican Army and government officials, as well as photographers and journalists of the government. They talked to the men and women, while the police took advantage of this to set the houses of the Zapatista support bases on fire."

"How is it possible, that the bad government talks about dialogue, while its police and army burn down the belongings of the compañeros Zapatista support bases?"

The Fray Bartolomé de Las Casas Human Rights Center, Fray Pedro Lorenzo de la Nada Human Rights Center, Serapaz and others have also denounced the evictions and demanded that the communities be compensated for their heavy loss.

They also warn that seven more communities are facing imminent eviction, including Nuevo San Gregorio, Nuevo Salvador Allende, Nuevo San Pedro, 6 de Octubre, Poblado Laguna El Suspiro, Ojo de Agua el Progreso and San Jacinto Lacanjá.

Throughout the current and previous administrations in Mexico, nearly fourty communities have been evicted from the Lacandona forest.

Send a Letter to Mexican Authories: http://www.rainforest-rescue.org/protestaktion.php?id=543

Multinationals enter Chiapa's Rainforest - Indigenous Communities Violently Evicted

Multinational corporations are covetting strategic natural resources in the Lacandon Forest in the Mexican state of Chiapas. At the same time, the state government is pursuing ambitious plans to surround the Lacondan Forest with oil palm plantations, while disguising the forest around the plantations as ‘eco’- tourism areas. The corporations are preparing for those projects, by attacking and evicting indigenous communities.

On 21st and 22nd of January this year, the indigenous Tselales communities of Laguna El Suspiro and Laguna San Pedro Guanil, both inside the Biosphere Reserve of Montes Azuls in the Lacandon Forest, were evicted. Montes Azules is home to one third of Mexico’s biodiveristy.

According information by the newspaper La Jornada (in Spanish), the eviction took place on 19th January this year, when the head of the Federal Agency for Environmental Protection (PROFEPA) visited Chiapas. A few hours later, hundreds of policemen and soldiers evicted around twenty indigenous families (120 indiviuals) from their homes in the region.

Government sources state that the operation was carried out in coordination with the federal police, members of the Mexican Army and of PROFEPA, ironically in the presence of ‘representatives of the state’s human rights’. No details have been given as to who those human rights representatives were. Our understanding is that the Mexican government used fake ‘human rights representatives’ in order to commit human rights violations against indigenous peoples.

During the two operations, the police forces were heavily armed and used several helicopters. Witout any official documentation or court order, and by means of violence and threats against elderly people, women and children, they forced the indigenous people to leave their houses without being allowed to take any of their personal belongings, and took them to the city of Palenque. There, twelve villagers from Laguna San Pedro Guanil were taken to the government ministry and were interrogated without a solicitor or interpreter. Before being released, the villagers were made to sign a document without understanding the content. They later reported that intimidation was used to get them to respond to the question “Where are your fields where you grow drugs?”, a question which indicates how the government intended to justify the evictions retrospectively. The villagers report that various of their belongins as well as their houses, clothes and work tools have been destroyed, their fruit trees, maize and beans have been uprooted and their communal shop has been ransacked. Local witnesses report that after the evictions, the houses and belongings of the villagers were burnt. So far, no opportunity for resettlement has been offered.

Violent evictions and forced relocations had previously been carried out in approximately forty communities, by both the current and previous administrations. These are part of a policy to creating a ‘new order’ and clear the Lacandon Forest of people, particularly in the Montes Azules region. The Mexican state is thus promoting social dislocation and ongoing legal uncertainties as well as the appropriation of communal property in favour of private ownership. This results in the irreversible loss of the concept of land as a source of communal wealth.

Both the federal government of Mexico and the state government of Chiapas justify their actions by labelling the entire indigenous Tseltal, Tsotzil, Ch’ol and Tojolabal population in the Lacandon area as ‘irregular people’, ‘invaders’ and ‘predators’. The evictions are expected to continue. Several of the villages which were evicted were Zapatista supporters. Friends of the Earth has accused the governor of Chiapas of selling ‘the land and the territories of Chiapas to the highest bidder.”

The evictions can be understood through a strategic global project of ‘territorial evictions and control’, which is disguised as a ‘conservationist spirit for the benefit of humanity’ (or, as a government spokesperson has said “…for the good of Chiapas’, for the good of Mexico’s and for the good of the world’s environment”). In reality, it serves the interests of multinational corporations and private investors in strategic natural resources in this and other indigenous and peasant territories in Mexico and Central America: Biodiversity, forest cover, clean drinking water, natural scenery and minerals, are all coveted as resources by biotech and agribusiness companies (Monsanto, Pioneer, Norvartis, Bimbo), pharmaceutical companies (Pharmacia, Bayer, Pfizer, Sanofi Adventis), car and oil firms (Ford, General Motors, Shell, the International Automobile Association (FIA), drinks manufacturers (Coca Cola, Nestle, Pepsi), hotel chains and false ‘eco-tourism’ firms (Mexican Association for Adventure and Eco-Tourism, AMTAVE), as well as mining companies (CEMEX, owned by PEMEX. Several of them have had a direct or indirect presence in the Lacandon Forest for years. At the same time, the governor of Chiapas, Juan Sabinas, has imposed an ambitious programme of economic reform which icludes the expansion of oil palm plantations and aimes to turn Chiapas into one of the main centres of production for agrofuels, with all the impacts that go along with it.

Send a Letter to Mexican Authories: http://www.rainforest-rescue.org/protestaktion.php?id=543

Filed Under

6 Comments on "Mexico: The Lacandona Rainforest is being cleared of its People"

  1. Billy Jack Douthwright says:March 12, 2010 at 1:23 pm

    In “North America” there is really no distinction between governments and corporations when you look at how the situation is perpetuated. This has to be made clear.

    Also, wondering if it may be the best=most effective means of communicating solidarity, to not exclude{they are still welcome to demonstrate solidarity as best they can}, but to ‘bypass’ the types of named ‘Human Rights Organizations’, because I am not getting the sense that they are really being anywhere near as effective as is needed, and instead to be establishing official communications with the indigenous nations & groups of nations/peoples themselves? This in itself can be a more directly effectively forceful approach to knowing that our communications and other actions, in a league of solidarity, will be properly constituted and based in the force of law… for example, if it were discovered that Coca-Cola[just to illustrate] were involved, either directly or indirectly by having any operations whatsoever in Mexico, as they obviously do, then we=I can shut down Coca-Cola operations throughout my own territory & so it will go!

    • Ahni says:March 13, 2010 at 10:17 pm

      In “North America” there is really no distinction…

      Generally speaking, I think the same goes for the Church and NGOs too. There’s alot of good groups out there, of course; but they really are still based on the same model. Alot of the “heavyweights” also tend to act like any tyrranical company,imposing their agnedas and ignoring peoples concerns—though they are nowhere near as vicious.

      In any case, BJ, I think what you’re saying is the road that we need to go down, and there some signs that we are starting to… At least, that’s what I’m seeing with all these “Mingas” (mobilizations) the last couple years. I hope that it will catch on more; because the old styles of protest just aren’t enough. We literally have to compel the “change” we need (without violence) and that sort of thing rarely happens in isolation (and never never never from a two hour protest!).

      In the case of corporations, it would also be good to focus on the shareholders, which doesn’t happen too often, either. It can be hard to get the names, but in most cases the info is all on the net.

      And I totally agree about direct communication. There has been a few calls for a global indigenous communitications network (at gatherings in Venezuela, Mexico, and somehere in South-east asia), but I don’t think anything’s ever come of it. I think someone at the UN mentioned it too. My old mentor also use to talk about setting up something completely independant from the rest of the world, but it doesn’t seem very feasible right now.

      Personally, with all the stuff I’m writing here, I always try to get info direct from the source, but it’s pretty difficult if the communities don’t put out an offical statement. Either I can’t find the right contacts, don’t speak the right language, or I just don’t know who I can trust. The last thing I want to do is put out false information.

      Also, this is part of my reason for the online map that I’m trying to put together. It’s not very ideal, and I’ll need some help to finish it (and possibly some funds) but it will allow people to call a number from a mobile phone, or send an email or a twitter message—and from there it will go out directly to any number of people. The map is a bit of a luxury, and it could easily be cut out; and then the site would be a strict communication tool. It could be useful in a crisis. And the website itself could be “hidden” from public eyes (though it still wouldn’t be very secure.) It’s something to think about.

  2. BJ Douthwright says:March 14, 2010 at 10:52 am

    Sustained initiatives for sure, & proactive networking to achieve broader solidarity work through synergistic methodologies, mutual support campaigns & shared resources, are ways to start broader coalitions, too…

    You might have been referring to the UN Permanent Forum On The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples, comprised almost entirely of dedicated representatives from various indigenous nations around the globe(some of the very best who have been working within that forum for decades & brought about UNDRIP), yes, one could hope=expect that a broad based movement can & perhaps needs to grow out of & maybe soon detach from the UN?? Also, that body’s official position of Special Rapporteur is one of the, if not the most, influential reportage officers within the UN…

    Here is an interesting source I just came upon for finding background associations on high profile positions, major investment banks & the like, that might interest readers here?, :

    –the org I’m referring to is LittleSIS –& I’m pasting the link to the Dissident Voice article about LittleSIS~~ to provide 2 good sources in one!–:

    http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/03/littlesis-profiling-the-powers-that-be-online/

  3. Rebecca Velayas says:March 15, 2010 at 1:11 pm

    Move MIlitant…

  4. BJD says:March 16, 2010 at 9:09 am

    Quoting the standard Rabble/Babble admin query to you, Rebecca, :

    ‘Care to elaborate on that?’…

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Growing fuel instead of food: agro-fuels in Chiapas « Glasgowchiapassolidaritygroup's Blog

Have your say