News

Lines in the Forest: Grassy Narrows, Weyerhaeuser and the CBFA

By • Oct 12, 2010

Less than five months ago, several large environmental groups and logging companies declared a truce to the “war in the woods”, a long-standing campaign that frequently targeted customers and investors of companies like Weyerhaeuser, who have continuously pursued large-scale and damaging operations within the Canadian Boreal Forest.

However, to the shock and dismay of some activists in Canada, Grassy Narrows and other Indigenous Nations were shut out of the deal even though they are primary stakeholders who depend on the forest for their cultures and livelihoods.

It is especially troubling since Grassy Narrows has been a leader in the so-called war to protect the Boreal forest along with their territory, their health, their culture and their economy like so many other Indigenous Nations in Canada.

Then there’s the fact that some of the NGOs who agreed to the truce–that is, the Canadian Boreal Forest Agreement (CBFA)–have staunchly supported Grassy Narrows in the past. But now, it appears that any such support would undermine the conditions of the CBFA.

For instance, “To ensure that the days of Greenpeace dropping banners from Abitibi-Bowater’s HQ are long forgotten, the agreement stipulates that ENGOs will take back whatever bad things they may have said about FPAC [Forest Products Association of Canada] member companies in the past,” notes Dawn Paley in an article for the Dominion.

“The ENGOS [also] agreed to express a ‘continuum’ of support for FPAC members, ranging from ‘recognizing that [sic] the leadership represented by the commitment of FPAC Members to develop and implement the CBFA’ to ‘demonstrating support for products from the boreal operations of FPAC members,’” says Paley.

It’s unclear how far this support will go; but there is nonetheless a concern that it could interfere with long-standing struggles like the one led by Grassy Narrows, who’s territory was excluded from the protection zones outlined in the CBFA.

It’s worth noting that the territory of Grassy Narrows has already been severely depleted, in large part, by one FPAC member: the logging giant Weyerhaeuser. And now it appears that Weyerhaeuser is about to commence another round of logging on Grassy Narrows territory without their consent.

Because of the pending threat, last week Grassy Narrows called for a renewed boycott against the company. In an Open Letter to loggers, retailers and investors dated October 6, 2010, Grassy Narrows Chief Simon Fobister stated that “[w]e continue to call for the boycott and divestment of Weyerhaeuser Corporation due to their violation of our human rights as Indigenous Peoples.” The letter goes on to state that “[w]e will work with our supporters to promote, monitor, and enforce this position.”

Perhaps the letter should have also been sent to Greenpeace, the Canadian Boreal Initiative, Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, David Suzuki Foundation and ForestEthics and the other NGOs and Foundations who signed the CBFA with Weyerhaeuser and the other FPAC members.

After all, if they are now obligated to “show support” for Boreal Forest products, than they no different than Boise and AbitibiBowater before they decided to do the right thing, because of the “war.”

And if they must also defend the company, then they are also contributing directly to the Canadian government’s constitutional delinquency concerning the needs and rights of Indigenous Peoples in Canada.

At this point there are more questions than answers concerning the CBFA and why Indigenous Nations like Grassy Narrows were blatantly ignored by organizations that consider themselves allies. Maybe someone will come forward and set the record straight.

Either way, we can be sure that Grassy Narrows won’t back down any time soon; because the “war” for them is, in no uncertain terms, a matter of life and simple survival.


  • John Ahni SchertowJohn Ahniwanika Schertow is an indigenous rights activist of Mohawk (Kanienkehaka) and mixed-European descent. For the past 8 years, he has served as the e... read full bio

4 thoughts on “Lines in the Forest: Grassy Narrows, Weyerhaeuser and the CBFA

  1. Suzanne Fraser

    Hello – I’m reprinting our statement that was sent out last week, in case it was missed. Please get in touch with any questions.
    Suzanne Fraser, Canadian Boreal Initiative

    “We support the right of the Grassy Narrows First Nation to say no to industrial development, and believe that the Government of Ontario and the forest industry must respect this right.

    “Despite ongoing talks with Grassy Narrows, the Government of Ontario has prepared a contingency plan that would allow more than 27 clearcuts in the Whiskey Jack Forest, including many on the community’s traditional territory. For more than eight years, the community has consistently opposed clearcut logging on its lands, making the advancement of this contingency plan inappropriate.

    “Our organizations urge the Government of Ontario, and all stakeholders, to respect the Grassy Narrows First Nation and its call for a moratorium, and to cease plans for logging in the Whiskey Jack Forest until a time that the community has given its free, prior, and informed consent.”

    David Suzuki Foundation, Canadian Boreal Initiative, Greenpeace, Canopy and CPAWS-Wildlands League

    Reply
  2. Pingback: Lines in the Forest: Grassy Narrows, Weyerhaeuser and the CBFA « Climate Connections

  3. Pingback: Canada: Lines in the Forest: Grassy Narrows, Weyerhaeuser and the CBFA | Biodiversity is an important global issue

Leave a Reply

Connect with us

Get our latest articles by email!


Kia ora, I would like to say unless they, ( those who say no more Full- Blooded Maori), know the whakapapa of every single Maori in Aotearoa, they should just...
Mohawk??I stand and prepared to back my people at any and all cost...
I have worked with, lived with, and been around Copala Triquis for the past 12 years, and have researched extensively the political oppression in teh region - ever since the...
Thank you for your comment, trog69. You might have seen my update http://intercontinentalcry.org/wall-street-tea-party-convergence-19421/ on the story, including a link to a special report by Charles Tanner, titled Take these Tribes Down....
Good afternoon, Mr. Taber. I must admit that part of my astonishment upon reading about this is my complete ignorance that there is a concerted effort to take the rest...
Thank you, David. While it's good that some elected officials are joining environmentalists and tribes in opposing Gateway Pacific Terminal, the Tea Party, AFL-CIO and anti-Indian property rights activists have...
Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn comments on proposed coal trains and export terminals: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOi4iEsSl_k...
Thanks for commenting, Laura. Do you have more information about that? If so, please get in touch info(at)intercontinentalcry.org...
Who are the Anishinaabe
Ojibway Women Anishinaabe or more properly Anishinaabeg or Anishinabek (which is the plural form of the word) is a collective term that refers to the Ojibway, Odawa and...
Learn more about the and other Indigenous Peoples around the world

"In a media landscape made up of lies, flash, giant blind spots and corporatized sites of distraction, Intercontinental Cry is a trustworthy pathway to the truth where people who are committed to understanding Indigenous realities can gain insight and information to illuminate and activate their struggles."

Taiaiake Alfred
Professor of Indigenous Governance at UVIC and author of Wasáse
Hair of the Dog