All heil the rabbit-proof vest
Two obvious truths have been at the forefront of our minds ever since the government of Australia enacted the “Northern Territory Emergency Response” legislation two years ago — and, in no uncertain terms, began molesting the inhabitants of some 73 indigenous communities:
The so-called intervention is racist; and, the government is a coward for enacting it.
It is a molestation. And the government knows it. Right now they’re working overtime to alter the horrid truth and make themselves look more like champions of human rights by engaging in a long awaited consultation process. But it doesn’t change the fact that, despite all their so-called good intentions, the molestation continues unabated.
As for the consultation, two years too late, the Rudd Labor government announced it on May 21, 2009 – just one day before the United Nations Economic and Social Council renewed its concerns over the discriminatory nature of the intervention. Among many points raised, the Committee urged the government to conduct a formal consultation.
The illusion of process
The government officially began moving ahead with the consultation on June 15, 2009. Unfortunately most community members haven’t had the chance to participate in it… Nobody told them it was happening.
Noted by the Green Lefty Weekly, one community leader even said she didn’t learn about the consultation until some ABC journalists asked her about it. “That’s not good enough, ” she states. “It should have been a public meeting out in the open, for the whole community, not behind closed doors. It needs to be one voice out there in the open if this is proper consultation.”
Far from being “proper”—the consultation appears to be little more than a vulgar attempt to manufacture indigenous consent.
This kind of government scheming is a constant these days. There was another prime example earlier today. The National Indigenous Times, who obtained leaked documents from the government, reported that Indigenous Affairs Minister Jenny Macklin was advised by her department “not” to consult Indigenous People over any new land grab schemes.
“Read, agreed and noted” by Macklin on March 26, the documents also recommended against reinstating the Racial Discrimination Act (RDA) because it could lead to a “significant risk” in the courts. The RDA was formally suspended in 2007 in order to legalize the intervention.
Following her pledge, Macklin announced two weeks ago that the government now plans to drag 16 more indigenous communities into the intervention — in order to “compulsorily acquire” their land for infrastructure and other development. Prior to the announcement, the Tangentyere Council, which holds the land titles for all 16 communities, rejected the government’s demand to forfeit their land titles for a total of 40 years.
Incidentally, After the government’s finished with the Alice Springs land grab, it plans to take control of even more indigenous communities in Darwin.
“All heil the rabbit-proof vest”
There are hundreds, even thousands more examples just waiting to affirm those two obvious truths. But we don’t really need to go over them. At this point, it’s more important to dig even further down and get to the real heart of the matter:
It takes a certain kind of person or government to infringe upon peoples lives (with or without their consent) while promoting an image of moral integrity to the world, as Australia does with such remarkable success.
A sort of person who constructs a moral notwithstanding clause, which allows them to comfortably suppress any rational value and replace it with its precise opposite.
Professor Albert Bandura calls it “selective moral disengagement.” I’m calling it a “rabbit-proof vest.”
An off-shoot of the well-known rabbit-proof fence of the early 1900s, this “vest” provides the government with a makeshift solution to their own presence on the land — that is, to the legacy they’ve inherited and their open refusal to take responsibility for their actions and to learn from the “mistakes” of their ancestors.
Historically traumatized, The rabbit-proof vest gives them solace and comfort from an irrational fear of their own memory, their own identity, their own beliefs—and, of course, bunny rabbits.
As a result of this fear, modern Australia is doing exactly what the first and second and third wave of settlers did to the Indigenous Population.
In essence, the government’s behavior is that of the “remorseful rapist”. One day the guy almost beats a woman to death, tries to make himself big and strong. Sometime later he makes an impassioned plea for forgiveness. Tells her how wrong he was, how terrible he feels, and that he’ll never ever do it again. Ever.
While saying these heartfelt words, he’s thinking about doing it to her again.
The rabbit-proof vest is the embodiment of fascism and all forms of rationalized hate, exploitation and violence – whether we’re talking about Australia’s racism, Saddam’s rape rooms, Adolf Hitler’s “final solution” or Goldcorp’s incessant dribblings of good will and prosperity while 3 year-olds cry themselves to sleep at night because their community’s water in contaminated with mine waste.
Again, there are thousands of other examples.But among them all, Australia appears to stand on its own with their claim that the intervention is an act of “love” for Indigenous People.
Buying into their own propaganda, so pathetic and afraid, the govenrment will continue doing whatever they can think to justify their presence on the land, and to keep down what is so obviously buried in their own hearts and minds.






















Going to start paying closer attention to the dealings of the Austrailian government and the tribal peoples of the lands out there.Thank you for the info Ahni once again.
Good post.
I notice today that racist rudd is saying he thinks it would be ’sad’ if tourists can walk all over Uluru. What a joke – they don’t want to consult with indigenous people because they say what they don’t want to hear. I think it’s ’sad’ how indigenous people of Australia have been treated and are still treated.
“Racist Rudd” —- well said, Marty. I find it infuriating myself–even more now with Rudd because he hides behind a cloak of benevolence (while doing exactly what Howard always did). At least Howard practiced what he preached.
Thanks, A.
ps. I’ll have a great interview up tomorrow with “Uncle” Bob Randall that speaks well to all of this.
FYI: I just fixed up the article a bit. I hope it reads a bit better now.